The load that the blade would endure determines the design too. *Static loads in the form of centrifugal forces as well as torque and bending forces (in the form of air resistance) as well as dynamic loads of the moving blades. The shape of the blade is determined by the *thermal and mechanical boundary conditions which can vary a lot depending on the environment it functions and the application. The shape and construction of the root, shroud and airfoil of the blade are determined by its application (steam turbines, gas turbines, compressor), but in essence they all function the same. This week in #allaboutblades we will look at the blade/vane that is fitted to the wheel or rotor and how it is assembled. Somers, NREL Airfoil Families for HAWTs (NREL TP 442-7109, 1995).Previously we looked at the turbine that produces continuous power by fast-moving water, steam, gas wind, or other fluid. Krämer, Comprehensive evaluation and assessment of trailing edge noise prediction based on dedicated measurements, Noise Control Eng. Schlichting, Boundary Layer Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968). Hinze, Turbulence: An introduction to its mechanism and theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959). Joseph, Effect of aerofoil thickness on trailing edge noise, AIAA/CEAS 22 nd Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2016-2812 (Lyon, France, May 30–June 1, 2016). Joseph, Towards a non-empirical trailing edge noise prediction model, J. Zhu, Tuning of turbulent boundary layer anisotropy for improved surface pressure and trailing-edge noise modeling, J.
Madsen, Validations and improvements of airfoil trailing-edge noise prediction models using detailed experimental data, Wind Energy 15 ( 2012) 45–61. Drela, XFOIL: An Analysis and Design for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989). Parchen, Progress report DRAW: A prediction scheme for trailing edge noise based on detailed boundary layer characteristics, in TNO Report HAG-RPT-980023, (TNO Institute of Applied Physics, The Netherlands, 1998). I and II, in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (Academic Press, London, UK, 1986). Blake, Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration, Vols. Kraichnan, Pressure fluctuations in turbulent flow over a flat plate, J. Hodgson, Trailing edge noise prediction from measured surface pressures, J. Howe, A Review of the theory of trailing edge noise, J. Roos, Resolution and structure of the wall pressure filed beneath a turbulent boundary layer, J. Curle, The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound, Proc. Lamb, Hydrodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 6th ed., 1932). Amiet, Effect of the incident surface pressure field on noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge, J. Amiet, Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge, J. Chase, Noise radiated from an edge in turbulent flow, AIAA J. Chandiramani, Diffraction of evanescent waves with applications to aerodynamically scattered sound and radiation from unbaffled plates, J. Hall, Aerodynamic sound generation by turbulent flow in the vicinity of a scattering half-plane, J. Chase, Sound radiated by turbulence flow off a rigid half-plane as obtained from a wavevector spectrum of hydrodynamic pressure, J. Marcolini, Aifoil self-noise and prediction (NASA RP 1218, 1989). The maximum camber position is also found to be important and its rear position increases noise levels on the suction side. However, a higher camber reduces low frequency noise on the pressure side. As airfoil thickness and camber increase, low frequency noise is increased. However, the effect of the airfoil shape on the maximum source region on the pressure side is negligible, except for the S831 airfoil, which exhibits an extension of the noise source region near the wall at high frequencies. As airfoil thickness and camber increase, the maximum source region moves slightly upward on the suction side. It is found that the dominant source region is around 40% of the boundary layer thickness for both the suction and pressure sides for a NACA0012 airfoil. The method is validated for a NACA0012 airfoil, and then five additional wind turbine airfoils are examined: NACA0018, DU96-w-180, S809, S822 and S831. This decomposition helps in finding the dominant source region and the peak noise frequency for each airfoil. In order to investigate the noise source characteristics, the wall pressure spectrum is decomposed into three components. The boundary layer profiles are obtained by XFOIL and the trailing edge noise is predicted by a TNO semi-empirical model. This paper investigates the effect of airfoil shape on trailing edge noise.
0 kommentar(er)
